Well here we are then, it’s been a while since I decided to write something(-ish) and whilst a lot has changed and we’ve thankfully had some cricket to keep us sane there are still many of the same fundamental issues England need to iron out ahead of back-to-back World T20 campaigns in India and Australia respectively.
Part 1 : Batting
Who will open the batting?
England’s T20 side is cluttered with valid opening options but as we head closer and closer to the World T20 in India it looks as though they are likely pick two from the trio of Jos Buttler, Jonny Bairstow and Jason Roy.
Jonny Bairstow can consider himself a lock in the top three given his pedigree opening the batting in both international cricket and the IPL, as well as slipping down to the #3 slot in the last tour to South Africa. There is a case for Bairstow taking up more of a middle order role given his skillset against spin(which will come in handy in India), as well as to help break up the flurry of left-handers likely to come after England’s top three, but that is better saved for another time.
The case for Jason Roy’s importance in this T20 side has been slowly whittled away, although partly through no fault of his own as others simply took their opportunities after he missed out on all 6 T20Is during the English summer. There are still question marks regarding his ability to play quality spin, something which was exposed during a stint in the Pakistan Super League and in the previous T20I series against South Africa, where he also showed the ‘post powerplay lull’ side of his game that will worry an England side trying to play with a more ‘complete’ and ‘free-flowing’ batting style as they have done under Eoin Morgan. In India, against quality bowling units likely to possess multiple spinners, you can’t have such a significant flaw in your game, now is the time to make his case heard again.

As always there is still a debate flowing on Jos Buttler’s batting position. As an opener since the last World T20, he averages 40.83 and strikes at 151.96, which is a stark contrast to the 26.18 average and 132.69 strike rate he registers not opening. England are an aggressive outfit and this is something which will go in favour of Buttler opening, the think-tank will continue to try other options down the order to make this Buttler move work, as the upside is simply too good to simply give up on so quickly.
Eoin Morgan’s recent role switch and relative success at KKR suggests that he may be the one to take on the finishing burden for England, whilst Ben Stokes has untapped potential as a pure pace hitter at the death, adding plenty of ‘funky’ shots to his armoury too. Both Sam Curran and Jofra Archer also showed plenty of ability with the bat to add depth in this regard too, with Sam Curran used as a flexible option for CSK depending on what was required, meanwhile Jofra Archer’s six hitting capability papered over the cracks in a weak RR batting unit.
This is not to say that England will stick with Buttler opening no matter what, there will come a time when Morgan and co will elect to ‘give up’ and settle for him down the order given the high quality options lining up to replace him at the top, but I doubt they will lose this battle without a fight.
The other aspect to consider is how little exposure Buttler has had as a T20 finisher in recent years, arguably the role has changed since he last succeeded there and even Buttler himself would admit he was a little rusty in the role for Rajasthan in the IPL. Finishing isn’t easy and England would be foolish to wait until right before the World T20 and dropping him down the order, expecting an immediate return to the finisher Buttler we have become accustom to in ODI cricket and T20 cricket previously.
How will England use Moeen?

After seeing his KKR side use Sunil Narine in a pinch-hitting middle over role with some success, the question is whether Eoin Morgan will feel inspired by the move made by his side under the guidance of himself and Brendon McCullum.
England have long used Moeen in an ‘ineffective’ role, especially when compared to how other sides have made the most of his ability against spin (as the CricViz stats suggest), which is hardly bowled at the death where England have tried to use him. There is of course the argument for dropping Moeen considering his lack of bowling form but as mentioned previously, picking a player with a unique skillset like Moeen is an aggressive choice, Morgan’s stint as KKR captain could help to unlock that potential.
Is Dawid Malan good?
This must seem like a weird subject to talk about but don’t think about it as a debate around Malan’s ability, he is a quality T20 batter (#1 ranked if you care about that kind of thing), but it is more so his approach that has come under question, and whether or not this fits in with the England ‘philosophy’ that Eoin Morgan is trying to create.
As seen by the CricViz graphic above, Dawid Malan has a slight flaw in his game. He starts slowly….very slowly. The only reason you may not have noticed this is because he has such a good (unsustainable?) record of converting these slow starts into high scores through his excellent acceleration game and ability to take on spin and pace alike as and when required by the situation he has found himself in. But the question is what happens if he gets out early? What if he ends up with 8 off 10? This is something we are yet to see but no doubt this is in the thinking of those in charge of the side and arguably the reason he was left out of the side previously, despite his excellent record. Whether or not he is just an insurance policy style stopgap, an upgraded Root perhaps, and they elect to go for a more free-flowing, higher risk batter remains to be seen.
Ben Stokes is another interesting subject but given the options everywhere else I cannot see a spot for him other than at #5 or #6, which will sadly limit his effectiveness. After his IPL campaign opening the batting, and *that* innings against Mumbai Indians there should be more of a case for him opening the innings, but as one of the supposed better batsmen in the side(despite a very modest T20 record), he’s expected to be used to plug gaps in the line-up as and when, maybe arrest a collapse or drop down to face Rabada purely at the death. Stokes’ slow starting game will limit him here, although his recent IPL campaign may have dusted off a few cobwebs and the hope is to see a more freeflowing version of him in the future.
Feel free to let me know your takes on any of these issues as well as other things you’d like to hear me talk about via my twitter handle @BerbaSpinCric and stay tuned for the bowling aspect of this England T20 side in Part 2.







